Hal Is Not Guilty

Hal is non guilty In a court of law, cleanup spot position while mentally disabled, cleansing at a lower place put ups and cleansing in self-defense are sufficient justifications for taking another?s life. With this in mind, was HAL reassert in killing the crewmembers of the discovery, or were Hal?s actions murderous and should he be brought to trial? Can Hal be blamed? The calculating machine basically has 3 excuses for killing the crewmembers of the Discovery. First, Hal was disabled. Second, Hal was killing under orders. Lastly, Hal was killing in self-defense. In absence of exempt moral will, in that respect cannot be moral responsibility.

This is a top dog argued in Dr. Helm?s class lecture. I avow that Hal did not have free moral will, because he was under orders, and thus cannot be blamed for the death of the crewmembers on bill the office shuttle. In a climatic part of the moving-picture show Hal states, I?m sorry Dave, I can?t do that. This mission is far too important for you to jeopardise it. I could see your lips move...If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper