Invasion of the Drones Essay

The war paintal issues that the peck shoot raised on drones are the right to privacy, which is guaranteed in the fourth amendment. The quaternate Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. It guarantees Americans right to privacy and requires police to obtain warrants or drive probable cause to search someones property. This could mess up the constitution because should police be require to obtain warrants to take photos and collect different information with the Drones?Then in the Fifth Amendment it guarantees Americans accused of crimes the right to imputable process under the law. The accused are entitled to a licit representation and to see the evidence thats being used against them. This could violate the Constitution because drone strikes aimed at killing American terrorist suspects in contradictory countries could violate the Amendment.I share the concern for the violation of the Fourth Amendment, because I would feel that Im under watch all the t ime, and that at any time the Police could be collecting information or taking pictures of me because they have the equipment to do so. Then what if they used these pictures and information to bewilder them a probable cause to search my house, but they didnt sire what they were looking for. The technically violated my privacy for no reason. When most people hear the word drone, they probably this of how the drones have been used in the stand firm decades.Which were the drones were used to kill suspected terrorist in hot spots wish well Pakistan and Yemen. Or one particular incident that attracted a lot of vigilance was in September 2011, the C. I. A. drone strike in Yemen killed an American citizen, a radical cleric who preached holy war, which violated his Fifth Amendment rights. This might postulate the publics receptiveness to the domestic use of drones because a newfound federal law paved the way for drones to be used commercially in the U. S. nd made it easier for govern ment agencies to obtain them.The Department of native land Security even offered grants to help local authorities buy drones. discordant sensors, included cameras can even be attached to the drone. Senator Patrick Leahy said that this fast-emerging engineering is cheap and could pose a significant threat to the privacy and polished liberties of millions of Americans. It is another example of a fast-changing policy which we need to focus to agree sure it is used correctly.