Andrew Carnegie :: essays research papers

Andrew Carnegie was not only an outstanding industrialist, but also a great philanthropist. In the excerpt from page 105, Carnegie is stating that an end to Individualism would effect in a revolution not an evolution because it is changing charitable nature itself, and there would be no way to know if it would thus far be a kind for the breach. This excerpt was one difficult to air a communist utopia a policy of instituteing for the better of apiece other, not just for the individual alone.This concept of ending Individualism and inception one class of people, is one that arises with each leader (especi solelyy communist) trying to change a society during this period of history. I dont believe, however, that Andrew Carnegie was trying to become a leader or begin a revolution. He was strictly stating his opinions on wealth and in turn giving that wealth absent. Carnegie was a man of many contradictions. He was the wealthiest human being of all time, and he was convinced of the value of poverty in developing character.In Carnegies later life, I believe he had realized his selfishness with his wealth and felt the need to give it away. In the excerpt, I feel he was assessing his own situation of wealth and was trying to encourage the rest of macrocosm to not live the type of life he had experienced. He stated, it is a nobler ideal that man should labor, not for himself alone, but in and for a sodality of his fellows, and share with them all in common I sense that the causal agent he made this statement was to encourage mankind to give away their wealth and not hold it for their own possession. Carnegie felt that society should work together instead of individually. In many ways I obligate with his statement, but I dont feel that this is a executable concept. Individualism is something I wouldnt want taken away from me because I wouldnt be able to have that constant desire to better myself.