Learning Theory Essay -- behaviorism, social learning, cognitive learn

Learning is defined as a, relatively lasting change in an organisms doings due to experience (Myers, 2010). The purpose of this makeup is to present a critical analysis of the distinct theoretical approaches and explanations for attainment through an examination of the theories of behaviorism, social learnedness and cognitive. I will canvass the principles and postulates of each(prenominal) theory, their strengths and their weaknesses. It is my belief that because each theory is surmount applicable to alter types of training, it is best that a combination of each is used to provide the virtu wholey complete tuition experience.Behaviorism is a theory that focuses on objectively observable behaviors, while discounting mental activities. Behavior theorists thus define learning as an observable or quantifiable change in behavior through the universal learning process known as conditioning. on that point are two types of conditioning, classical and operant, each of which yield a different behavioral pattern.Classical conditioning, also referred to as, Pavlovian conditioning, is a type of learning in which an organism learns to associate two stimuli the conditioned (an initially deaf(p) stimulus) and the innumerable (a stimulus that routinely triggers an unconditioned response). If the conditioned stimulus accompanies the unconditioned stimulus, one will eventually learn to elicit an anticipatory and preparative conditioned response in the presence of the conditioned stimulus exclusively (p 228). Although the ideas of classical conditioning were incomplete, if we see further than Pavlov did, it is because we stand on his shoulders. (p 235) He provided us with a type of learning that is virtually applicable to all organisms dur... ...ent can take place of what is happening, and whether it is positive to enlarge the students contributions in learning from life, thereby reducing the adaptive role of the teacher.To seek a best way to stru cture learning runs the risk of imposing conformity on what should be a rich and diverse experience. As you can see, each theory has its positive and negative aspects, which is why I suggest a pragmatic approach that considers both the learner and the subject matter at issue and then opts for the approach -- classical/operant conditioning, social learning, cognitive, or a combination -- that best suits that particular learning experience. Works CitedMyers, David G. (2010). Exploring Psychology, eigth edition. cutting York Worth Publishers.Rabinowitz, B., Siegel, Dr. S. & Spear., Dr. N. (2004). Class tapes COCR958 The Science of Psychology.