Race by the Numbers Essay

In his clause, run by the Numbers, Orlando Patterson argued ab surface the mistake of the number results and that this mis reading is having negative effects on the perspective of the people. The misinterpreted part of the census, according to Patterson, was the subject that the people of the Whites is becoming the nonage in m more or less(prenominal) areas of the country. Thus, Patterson offered arguments and roots to disprove the grimness of the interpretation. However, the inquiry is whether or non Patterson was competent to gestate the readers, the citizens, that the interpretation of the census report was and so incorrect.Pattersons clause is full of cultivation especi e real last(predicate)y statistical and quantitative information that helped him in establishing ground for his arguments. Patterson statement that 48 percent of Hispanics classified themselves as but discolour (p. 83) adds to his persuasive argument that is be gradients support by the next decla re in the expression, Hispanics roll in the hay be of any race (p. 83). These statements clearly supported the particular that the make sense percentage of Whites in was diminish as interpreted by the census report.Patterson similarly included studies that affirm his assume including recent census result. Patterson declared that, whites bequeath constitute 74. 8 percent of the hail population in 2050, and that non-Hispanics will comfort be 52. 8 percent of the total (p. 83) as argued by the recent census. With much(prenominal) facts indicated in the article, it can be give tongue to that Patterson was commensurate to build a watertight evidence and supporting detains and information regarding his assertions. Thus, his argument, regarding the population of white Americans in the country, is a unwashed distortion (Patterson p.83) is not a guileless point of view but is supported by facts and relevant information. By establishing the facts and the arguments, it can be said that Pattersons important purpose of writing the article was to turn out that the population of whites in America is lighten and will stretch to be the volume disproving the assumption that non-Hispanic whites will cease to be the majority (Patterson, p. 82). By doing so, Patterson aims to hike the whites that they appease are the majority and will continue to be. In this case, Patterson was able to do ample job through his article.However, Patterson also indicated in his article the melodic theme that each root word in the new minority-majority country has longstanding grievances against whites, thus, Patterson whitethorn also want to bring the invalidity of this assertion through his article. entirely in this case, was Patterson hard-hitting? Basing from the article, Patterson was very able to encourage the whites and take away the interrogation that they will cease to be the majority. However, Patterson was not able to take away the idea that minority groups i n America sire grievances on whites.On the contrary, it even points out an otherwise idea, that whites does not becharm minority groups as to be equal to them. Thus, quite of disproving the issue of minorities having grievances on whites, the article may even fuel the said issue. The article can trigger grievances against whites since the article establishes the idea that whites are and will continue to be the superior race in the country. Therefore, this may cause insecurity and rebellion against the white race since others may wish to see the downfall of a superior race. Patterson also included historical developments in regarding some issues such as the classification of races.Patterson stated that, In 1930 Mexicans were classified as a separate race by the count Bureau which reclassified them as white in 1940, after protests (p. 84). Patterson also stired 2 other related issues in history. In this case, Patterson was able to convince the readers regarding the misclassif ication done that lead to the mistaking of the census result. Thus, Patterson once again launch a ground for his ideas and arguments by nullifying the classification made by the census sanction on the issue of which races are to be included as whites.As mentioned earlier, the designer was able to establish the supporting facts most his alleges. However, there are some instances that the pen failed to mention relative and important information. Patterson adapted a study stating that, Recent studies indicate that the second-generation Hispanic whites are intermarrying (p. 83). However, Patterson did not mention what particular study reaches that conclusion. Therefore, readers in precariousness of that particular argument have no means of verifying the claim.Patterson should have indicated all the necessary information about the inquiry to enable the readers to locate the particular study, otherwise doubts will remain doubts in the minds of the readers. Although the article has its strengths, i. e. the use of statistical information, the helplessness of the article is readily available to the readers. The main weakness of the article was that the author, Mr. Patterson, was obviously one sided in writing the article. The bias can be seen from the very beginning of the article. Thus, this limits the trust of the readers and the rightfulness of the writer.Showing personal biases is will really lead to doubts and disbeliefs of the authors claim since the readers are aware that he or she is arguing for or against one side. Thus, in persuading the readers about a certain operation or issue, one must lay out personal biases for this will weaken the arguments and the ideas presented by the author. In order to establish a ground proof about an argument, a writer must not salute biases as much as possible. It would be better to show the different arguments of both side and show relative information, facts and evidences and allow the readers decide which ar guments weigh more basing from the inclined evidences.All in all, Patterson did a not bad(p) job in laying the arguments and he was able to fulfil his main objective, to encourage the whites. However, as mentioned earlier, the article has its own weaknesses as well. Thus, the article would only be effective if the reader is taking the same side as Pattersons, otherwise, the article would seem very racist of which whites are considered incomparable to others. The validity of the claims is thus, very subjective on the reputation and side that the readers will take.